Latest Blog Posts

Announcement: Preditors and Editors Readers’ Poll 2016

James Bojaciuk and Ben Kasson

You did it again.

You absolutely floored us with your kindness.

Not only did you nominate us for multiple categories in the 18th Annual Preditors and Editors Readers’ Poll, you voted with us in such force that we either won or placed in the top ten in nearly every category.

That’s unbelievable.

Thank you so much for your continued support, and kindness. We do this for you.

Congratulations, and thanks, to all our authors, editors, and artists for the fine work you do. You’re outstanding, every one of you.

Whenever anything we’ve released receives an award, we can’t help but feel an overwhelming surge of pride and gratitude for the people we’ve met and gotten to work with while embarking upon this crazy road.

It’s times like these that make every bump and every pothole worth it.

We got into publishing not only because we couldn’t stay away from the world of literature if we tried, but also because we wanted everyone involved in the process to be better appreciated, from artists, to authors, to editors. This goes a long way toward giving them the appreciation they deserve.

Without further ado, let’s review our winners, in alphabetical order.

After Avalon

Our big winner, After Avalon, walked away with two awards…

Barbara Sobczyńska’s gorgeous cover–which Jon Black called “dreamlike and hauntingly symbolist”–took home the well-deserved award for Best Artwork. Barbara specializes in spectral visions that tease the imagination and capture your imagination. She did no less with this cover. She can capture mood and intangible ideas with the greatest of ease.

It’s impossible to say enough kind, or insightful, things about her art. It needs to be seen to be appreciated, and I can only hope this increases her audience tenfold.

After Avalon itself was also voted the #4 best anthology, Congratulations to Colin Fisher, Leigh Ann Cowan, Amy Wolf, Thomas Olivieri, Jon Black, Patricia S. Bowne, Claudia Quint, David Wiley, Christian Bone, Patrick S. Baker, and Elizabeth Zuckerman; special congratulations to the curator, Nicole Petit, for assembling the book, and discovering what became of Logres after Camelot fell.

Readers have responded overwhelmingly for this book full of the Arthurian world’s magic.

Nicole Petit

Nicole Petit earned a bronze medal finish for all of her editing this year, ranging from her unique anthologies After Avalon and Just So Stories to her role as 18thWall Productions’ native series editor (particularly notable, in 2016, for her work on Dead West). I’ve never met anyone with a greater innate understanding of storytelling, or knowledge of what makes a story the best it can possibly be. She earned this award a dozen times over.

I also don’t know of anyone better at discovering new talent, encouraging writers to be their best, guiding stories and prose to their brightest, or, simply, being a writer’s support and friend. The literary world is lucky to have an editor like her, and 18thWall is equally as lucky to employ her.

 

A Study in Grey

John Linwood Grant’s A Study in Gray was proud to walk away with…

John placed tenth with this entry in his The Last Edwardian series, a weird fiction series that has more than earned its first award.

I’m not sure where John has been keeping himself all these years, but from the moment he did appear, I knew three things. First, that his fiction had something of the touch of the early Neil Gaiman–obviously magical, and character-focused while old-time-narrator-driven, and deeply inspired by pre-war genre trends. Second, that he would make a name for himself and win an absurd amount of readers and awards. Third, obviously, that a writer this excellent deserves a place to write, and that I should quickly give it to him.

To John! Let this be the first award of many!

The Whole Art of Detection

M.H. seems to be trying to make winning awards for her mystery novellas as effortless as Cinderella’s make-over. She was proud to be awarded…

She earned the #4 spot in the awards for The Whole Art of Detection, with her tale of Sherlock Holmes’ legacy, rip-off fantasy novelists, incredibly astute detectives, wise women, the lies we choose to believe, and certain worms unknown to science.

M.H. has grown very much as a writer since she appeared on the scene with Badge City: Notches, and it’s been a great pleasure, as a publisher, to give her a playground where she can grow to her full potential.

Rather than say anything else, I’m excited to see her even more grow into her role as “mystery maven.”

Runner Up: The Dragon Lord’s Secretary

I wouldn’t normally mention a runner up, but all of you fought hard for The Dragon Lord’s Secretary. As I watched the rankings in the last day, I saw this one briefly break into the top ten before falling back. It bounced up and down the rankings several times before the contest ended with it at #15. In the end, I imagine it only missed the top ten by five or six votes.

Thank you for all your support for Nicole’s novel!

Preditors and Editors Winners’ Sale

Perhaps you knew this was coming. it seems to be a tradition with us and awards. But we like to take this moment to give you a chance to read any of our winners you haven’t already read, and see what all the fuss is about.

Until March 1st, all of our winners are 20% off!

You can find them at the links below!

After Avalon

Just So Stories

Dead West: West of Pale

A Study in Grey

The Whole Art of Detection

The Dragon Lord’s Secretary

If Walls Could Talk: Research and Rabbit Trails

M.H. Norris

The internet can be a writer’s best friend, especially when it comes to research. But it can also quickly become a writer’s worst nightmare.

It’s no secret that often times I’ll wander off on a rabbit trail here as I make my way to whatever point I happen to have that day. Maybe occasionally I have a reason for wandering off on said rabbit trail…

Yeah, I do it a lot. Here in my weekly column, in discussions I have with people, and when I do research, too.

There was a time with Badge City: Notches where I hadn’t quite decided how it was going to end. Actually, if you go and look on what I submitted to Pro Se vs. how the book actually ended,  they’re a little different. The whodunit didn’t change, but I had a scene in my head that I was tempted to write.

But to write it, I had to do some significant research.

This was a two day researching session going on websites, blogs, and going over the chapter in one of my books I was reading.

Part of the reason I spent time on this scene was I felt like I needed to justify a decision I’d been thinking about. I felt like I could justify after that research.

But then, after spending two days on research I later decided to ditch that whole scene. I probably would have done it earlier than I did if it weren’t for that fact that I was being butt-stubborn.

So in the end, that ended up being something I left unsaid,  and something I considered addressing later.

Later won’t come.

But maybe sometime someone will ask me about it, or stumble across this post and ask me what that two day research session was about and what I left unsaid…

Yesterday, news broke on a slightly-related topic to my two-day research session and I ended up spending two hours looking up the case, the development in it that got me started on that rabbit trail just going over it in a sense.

So my research rabbit trail caused a rabbit trail of its own…

That’s my problem with research. I find something I find fascinating and then I end up spending way more time than I should working on that–instead of what I should be researching.

That’s why I said the internet can be a writer’s best friend or their worst enemy. The sheer amount of information out there can be overwhelming and trying to sort out what is useful to you and what isn’t is a full time job.

That, and the act of having to research a novel can be overwhelming. Which is why it sometimes takes me a while to slide into that stage of writing a book.

With Notches, I had pages upon pages of notes. Yet I was still going to Google while writing the story. I had articles printed out, statistics memorized, and a story in mind. But, sometimes, I still needed more.

Research lays the foundation for the rest of the story.

The trick is making sure you don’t let yourself get but so distracted when laying that foundation.

If Walls Could Talk: Taking an Idea and Making a Story

M.H. Norris

Let’s talk Research and a little contest update

It seems like every time I start a new story I find myself surprised at the struggles I go through in order to even get the project started, much less have anything that resembles a story.

Not only is there research to be done, there’s figuring out the story.

I’ve found it comes in pieces. At least, that’s how Badge City: Notches got started. Pro Se Productions gave me the series bible. From there, it came in pieces.

Deidre is a detective, yes. But what kind of crimes does she investigate? Murder, robbery, vice? The list goes on for a bit. Honestly, I chose murder because into USA Network’s Psych at the time. Because I’d watched SO MANY of those episodes, I was really familiar with the concept.

That didn’t stop me from spending a month researching various things about it. I read articles, website material, and books about the subject. One of my favorites (and one I recommend if you are writing police procedurals) is Police Procedure and Investigation: A Guide For Writers by Lee Lofland. I found it by accident—but I liked it so much I ended up later getting another book of the series (Forensics: a Guide For Writers by D.P. Lyle M.D.).

But before I got to all that research, there was the little issue of having to submit a full synopsis to Pro Se. I think I’ve said it a few times here, but let me say it again, I hate having to write synopses.

Hate it. Hate it. Hate it.

I’ll barely concede there’s value to them. But I feel like they are, at times, constraining—especially in the form that I had to do for Badge City. That would be what they approved. To me, as a new writer, I felt like I couldn’t change what I submitted.

Here’s your fun fact.

That synopsis took me three days to write and it was maybe three pages.

Those who knew me were surprised when they read Notches because I like to call it an adventure into my dark and twisted side.

It involved going back and forth with James and a series of what ifs. I’d say “what if this happens?” Then he’d ask me why, or can I justify it, or how does it affect the story?

And back and forth we went.

Variations of this happened with The Lemon Herberts and “Midnight” as well. Though I’ll admit I didn’t completely know who did it when I started writing The Whole Art of Detection. I think I got several thousand words in and was like, “I really should figure out who did this, shouldn’t I?”

Confessions of a mystery writer.

The Whole Art of Detection was nominated in the 18th Annual Preditors and Editors Reader’s Poll for Best Mystery.

So, I guess I didn’t do but so bad.

You’ve got until the 14th to vote, so if you haven’t please do.

Pretty please.

You can vote here.

And vote for Nicole Petit too. She’s up for Best Fantasy/Science Fiction Novel. Her Anthology After Avalon is up for Best Anthology and Best Artwork. She’s also up for Best Editor, something well deserved.

Best Editor: Nicole Petit

Best Anthology: After Avalon

Best Artwork: After Avalon

Best Science Fiction & Fantasy Novel: The Dragon Lord’s Secretary, by Nicole Petit

Voting is easy. Follow the link, click on the book you’d like to vote for, enter your email address (they won’t spam you), and hit submit. Check your email for a link to click to prove you’re a real human. Then you’re done!

Rabbit trail successfully chased…where was I?

Oh yeah!

This is where I find myself now, for Rosella’s first novel. I have a setting in mind, I have the myth in mind. It’s down to weaving the two, figuring whodunit and whydunit, and maybe having an actual plot in mind.

The Midnight Game lended itself to “Midnight” by its very existence. Others myths, legends, and stories take a bit more creativity t work into a mystery. I think I know where the key lies, now. I just don’t quite know the answer to that question yet.

If Walls Could Talk: Location Research

M.H. Norris

As 2016 came to a close and we welcomed in 2017, I started digging back into research for the first full length All the Petty Myths novel. I have the myth, I have the location—but the latter is one thing I need to spend time researching.

There is the old saying, write what you know, but honestly, that takes the fun out of it. It’s no secret that writers do write settings in places they know little about, when they set out to write the book.

And here I sit, wondering how to do research on it. Originally I thought it would be as simple as visiting Barnes and Noble and picking up a guide book. But looking at what they had to offer, I realized those are geared where they should be, to tourist who wants to visit the city in question.

So yes, within the pages of the guide books I can see the city’s top tourist destinations, the best places to eat, museums to visit, places to stay, a variety of things.

But it misses what gives the city life. The history, the culture, a way to ground the story and give it the sense of place it desperately needs.

Short stories you can get away with to a certain extent, but for a full length story you need to have a fair amount of knowledge.

Let’s take Badge City: Notches for an example.

All I was given regarding the city was that it was known as “Badge City” and had gained that nickname because of its historically strong police force.

That was it.

Everything else you read within the pages was something I spent days mapping out. Its state (Northern California), its proximity to the shore (I left a body on a beach and had to decide it that was a viable option before plotting that out), its general population (I couldn’t find my notes but I believe I had it somewhere around 1 million people), a bit of its history (past mayors, economic state, and a few other details), its streets and landmarks, as well as a couple of other things.

To me, that was something that brought it alive and helped make it as strong as it was.

Even with an established place, some of the locations are made up. In my story for The Lemon Herberts, set in 1960s Sydney: some geography was real, while a lot of the locations were made up (I think I used an actual hospital, but their hotel was made up).

Another thing that gave that story a sense of place was the time. For the most part, I’ve stuck with contemporary pieces because it is easier. But that one gave me a fun challenge. I was used to having modern technology to help my heroes solve the crime. The Lemon Herberts didn’t have that advantage.

And trust me, there were many times where I wanted to yell at the 1960s for their lack of computers. They make crime solving so much easier.

God bless the internet.

So here I sit, doing research and having trouble deciding where to start. I’ve been tempted to turn to Reddit to see if people in sub-Reddits for the city can give me insight. Wesley Julian’s had great success with that. I also got advice to watch TV shows based in that city, but unfortunately none are on Netflix at this time. I will also look into books.

But wouldn’t it be nice if there was a website where an author could go to and say “Hey I want to write a story in this place. Is there anyone willing to help me learn about it?”

Then the information is there for the next time someone wants to use that setting.

Alas, this does not exist (the closest thing I can think is Reddit—hence my temptation to use it). If I could afford to go spend a couple of days there I would love to. Alas, it is not in my budget at this time.

But, I can’t wait to get going on this story and bring more of Rosella to you soon. Hopefully I will have more news on the anthology soon!

Available Now: The Horror Crossover Encyclopedia: Second Edition

James Bojaciuk

It’s our pleasure to announce the second edition of Robert E. Wronski Jr.’s The Horror Crossover Encyclopedia.

The Horror Crossover Encyclopedia is the ultimate guide to horror genre easter eggs, crossover stories, and cameos. They not only catalogue a history of influence and homage, but a secret secondary world which ties together everything from the Invisible Man to Ghostbusters, or H.P. Lovecraft’s Cthulhu Mythos to Aliens.

Robert E. Wronski Jr. is the virtuoso researcher who created the Television Crossover Universe, founded the Television Crossover Universe Podcast, and authored or is authoring several other books on the subject. If you need to know when Lucy Ricardo met Superman, he’s the man to ask.

All-new features include:

  • Expanded and corrected entries;
  • A new introduction by Mr. Wronski, looking back on the book;
  • A new preface by Dynamo Mars;
  • All-new, high-quality images;
  • All-new typeset, for increased readability

Available now from 18thWall.com and Amazon.

If you previously purchased The Horror Crossover Encyclopedia:

If you previously purchased The Horror Crossover Encyclopedia from 18thWall.com, the second edition is already available in your account. If you purchased the ebook somewhere else online, we’ll happily provide you a free digital copy with proof of purchase (send it to mhnorris@18thwall.com).

If you previously purchased the print edition: if you send a picture of yourself holding the print edition to mhnorris@18thwall.com, we’ll give you 25% off the new edition. (Alternatively, you could simply send us a proof of purchase–but what would be the fun in that?)

 

If Walls Could Talk: Nominations

M.H. Norris

Not too long ago, yet at times it truly does feel like a lifetime ago, I started coming to the realization that perhaps I could take this little hobby of mine and maybe attempt to make a living out of it.

I’d been writing short stories for ages and have a couple of notebooks of old short stories and files of early attempts that make me just want to cringe and wonder how I thought that maybe I could make a living off of this.

Granted, by not giving up and continuing to improve my craft, I have become the writer I am today.

I got into a discussion about writing and making it to a point where one can make an actual living off of it. It takes time for most writers to get to the point where they can sustain themselves in this business.

Can you get to the point where you can?

Yes.

Is it going to be easy?

No.

I’ve been a published author for four years now and feel like I’ve still got a ways to go to be where I want to be as a writer.

I’m not discounting the people who became overnight successes.

But I’m not depending on that for myself.

Earlier this year, I was recording my first ever episode on the Television Crossover Universe Podcast. When James and I wrapped up with the gang, we discovered that Badge City: Notches had been nominated for Best Novella in the 2016 Pulp New Ark Pulp Awards.

I was an award-nominated author.

It wasn’t even that I’d won yet. At that point I hadn’t. It was that I was even nominated in the first place that made my day.

I’ve mentioned it a few times here but often I feel like my writing isn’t that good and I wonder how Notches did as well as it did…

But to be nominated for an award…

I think I called half my phone telling people I’d won when the winners were announced. The awards were going to be given about 600 miles away from where I live and I figured I wouldn’t be able to make it.

But then my mother got it in her head that this was something I shouldn’t miss, accepting my first ever award for writing. She went through a lot so that I could be there.

I got to meet J Patrick Allen, author of the Dead West series, while there. He won an award as well and it was fun meeting another 18thWall author.

Now the award sits in my office, letting anyone who wanders into my domain that I’m an award-winning author. A friend had gotten me a blown-up framed cover for my college graduation, and now I’ve got the two arranged.

So, by now I’m sure you’re wondering why I decided to talk about this today. Or rather, why James let me ramble on about this for a week.

The 18th Annual Preditors and Editors Readers Poll (http://critters.org/predpoll/) is out and myself along with some of the other authors from around the Wall are nominated!

Here’s our current nominations:

Best Science Fiction & Fantasy Novel: The Dragon Lord’s Secretary, by Nicole Petit

Best Mystery Novel: The Whole Art of Detection by M.H. Norris

Best Anthology: After Avalon

Best Artwork: After Avalon

Best Editor: Nicole Petit

Another nomination, albeit one that isn’t around the Wall: The Time Travel Nexus is up for best review site as well.

New Call for Stories: Their Coats All Red

Anthology Curated by John Linwood Grant and Matthew Willis

To the office of the Prime Minister:

As you have no doubt been made aware from previous correspondence, Mr. Gladstone, problems of an unusual nature still arise in the further reaches of Her Majesty’s empire.

You remember the transport we lost in the Chinese seas, and manpower spent keeping it from the press. One of the officer’s wives, a Mrs. Kathleen Morland, was found drifting in the same waters. Yes, two years later. She wore strange finery, speaking in a language that we still haven’t placed, and only telling a broken story through far more broken English. She complains of voices from some long ago time, saying things she wishes she could forget. The ship which rescued was followed to port by strange lights.

One exploratory party Africa reported total darkness for a period of 106 hours. No trace of the sun. Light suddenly returned around noon. When their guide returned the following day, he was nearly mad with grief. “The darkness now resides within us. Our light has faded.”

Just as I was about to hand this to my secretary, one more report arrived. Trouble along the Indian border, as ever. Word is fragmentary, also as ever, but suggests something unhealthy and alive in the biting wind.

While troubling, I don’t believe there is anything the foreign office can do at this time. We’ll continue to look into these on a case by case basis—but the difference in geography, actors, and dates seems to suggest we can do little but watch, record, and pray.

Yours truly,

[The signature is missing, crumbling away to a burnt-out blackness. The letter shows signs of having been thrust into the fire, but saved before the letter was wholly consumed.]

What We Want

Their Coats All Red: Dark Tales of Empire is seeking strange stories which are steeped in the history of the British Empire from about 1880 to 1905. These must be tales which capture the feel of the high Victorian era.

We don’t want stories of the Empire itself—we want stories of the weirdness underneath. Ghosts, spirits, madness and monstrosities are all welcome. Make it psychological or physical, but make it good.

Crucially, every submission must contain an element of the weird, the uncanny, the supernatural, or the paranormal. This may be in the form of spirits, hauntings, monstrosities, folklore and folk-horror from the region in question, or simply the completely inexplicable. Dark, foreboding, or unsettling are good keywords. Weird fiction also encompasses dark fantasy, of a sort, opening the door for dark historical fantasy a la Manly Wade Wellman, Neil Gaiman, or Tim Powers.

We are looking for stories which reflect the vastness and variety of the Empire, and so suggested geographical settings include, but are not limited to:

  • India and the Raj
  • The East Indies in general
  • China up to and including the Boxer Rebellion
  • Egypt and the Sudan,
  • West Africa and the later Ashanti Wars
  • South Africa, both the Zulu Wars and the Boer War
  • At sea, around, or going to or from, any of the above

We want to see the impact of Empire and its infrastructure, from any viewpoint. The military side of life on the frontier is an obvious one, and an encouraged one, but not the only approach.

We will check your history.

Characters of any relevant culture, ethnicity, or allegiance are welcome, not only the British soldiers. The lost, bewildered British soldier or colonial administrator; the embittered Indian servant or Rajah; the scorned Egyptian woman and the dying Boer farmer are all equally possible protagonists. What we do not want are stereotypes. Think real people in strange situations. No cartoon racists or noble savages.

Farmers marching under a parched South African noon to fight the Boer, with whom they often had more in common than they had with their own officers. Young London women shipped with their husbands to quarters in Calcutta with little company save their Indian servants. Traders and planters in Malaya, fighting the monsoon shadows, and the forlorn garrisons in the Sudan. The sailors of the West Africa squadron, seizing slave ships off the Gold Coast.

The Bombay char wallah, beaten once too often by the English Major for being too slow with his tea. The Zulu who trades his iklwa for a Martini rifle. The Egyptian woman who finds her officer lover will not acknowledge her in the street.

Complex and human are the watchwords. Be sensitive to the humanity of characters on all sides.

We would also like to encourage stories with female central characters. The high Victorian era is when modern women began seriously entering their own careers, studying science, and starting their own businesses. While there were many problems in the era, it would be exciting to see achievements celebrated, in fiction, instead of the era’s failings presented as the only path for women. This is, after all, also the era of Nellie Bly, Annie Oakley, Mary Kingsley, Isabella Bird, Marie Curie, Cristina Trivulzio Belgiojoso, Harriet Martineau, and Jane Addams, among many, many others.

Using the Cthulhu Mythos is acceptable, however we do not want simple retreads, pastiche, or Lovecraft-lite. Write something fresh, creative, and, of course, deeply embedded in the Empire if you choose to try this route.

If you would like to write a story regarding an earlier event (such as the Sepoy Rebellion), please query the editors.

What We Don’t Want

Don’t rely on ahistorical cliché. Corsets weren’t that tight (except for a hot five minutes in 1850s France). The English weren’t repressed, and all the evidence usually carted out to prove it is a hoax (“Lie on your back and think of England”) or a joke that started about Americans (“They cover the most scandalous, shapely legs in their house—the piano legs!”). Falling into ahistorical cliché is a serious black mark against stories.

We’re looking for realistic takes on the Empire itself. In other words, the Empire was neither cartoon monstrosity nor entirely wonderful. Like so many things, it was a mix of positive and negative. If stories try to address empire as a concept, or the English Empire in particular, it’s essential to keep this in mind. Stories which fail to keep this in mind will be an increasingly hard sell.

This does not mean we’re looking for stories where “The English only thought they were doing positive things in their Empire building.” We’re not interested in anything so dismissive of the past. We’re not looking for comments on Empire along the lines of “actual evil” versus “perceived good,” but the much more difficult and human, “actual evil” vs. “actual good.”

We are not interested in Steampunk.

A general historical story of the period, however weird and unnatural, will not cut any ice—it needs to be rooted in the Empire.

We are not interested in political screeds for or against the English Empire, or empires in general. 

We’d rather not receive missionary stories. It’s an over-used take on colonial issues, and unless it’s astonishing or very, very different, we’re not likely to let you get away it.

Stories set in locations such as America, Canada, Australasia, and the West Indies are also feasible, but they will be a harder sell unless they have directly relevance to the theme of Empire. Stories may be set in Britain, but they would have to relate to an aspect of Empire. No Victorian gents merely musing how they got shot in the leg in Afghanistan, please.

Sundry Details

Payment: 5% of the gross profit will be paid for each accepted story. These payments will be issued to you at quarterly intervals. Stories under 1,500 words will only receive 4% of the gross profit.

Rights: First World Digital and Print.

Deadline: April 15th, 2017

Word Count: 4,000-16,000

How to Submit your Story:

  • All stories should be sent, as an attachment, to theircoatsallred@18thwall.com.
  • The file must be formatted in .doc or .docx.
  • The interior of the document must be in double spaced Times New Roman (12 point font).
  • Indents must be placed through your system’s Paragraph function; do not set indents by pressing tab or space. If you already have tabbed or spaced indents, please remove them first. Please use full em dashes (—).
  • At the top of your document, please include William Shunn’s submission header.
  • Tell us a bit about yourself in the body of your email. Don’t stress this, it won’t make or break your submission.
  • Place the collection you’re submitting to, your name, and your story title in the subject line of your email. For example, “Their Coats All Red / Rudyard Kipling / The Mark of the Beast.”

John Linwood Grant is a writer of strange period tales and dark fiction, author of the Tales of the Last Edwardian series, including A Study in Grey, and co-editor of Occult Detective Quarterly.

Matthew Willis is a journalist and writer, author of a period sea novel Daedalus and the Deep, and editing credits include the recent Stalking Leviathan anthology.

Download Guidelines as a PDF

Those Magnificent Writers on Their Writing Machines #2 (12/17/2016)

James Bojaciuk

Welcome to the newest feature on the 18thWall Productions site, “Those Magnificent Writers on their Writing Machines.” Regularly, we’ll see what our writers are up to, tease you on upcoming 18thWall releases, and sometimes give you other exclusive previews and treats.

A magnificent writer on his writing machine.

What have our authors been up to?

As ever, authors and their works are in no order whatsoever.

Nicole Petit

Nicole Petit had a chance to be interviewed by John Linwood Grant on his soon-to-be-famous site, greydogtales. Click over for a chat about King Arthur, Sophie Aldred’s Ace, editing, curating, and After Avalon.

Nicole Petit on greydogtales

If you’re curious what this whole After Avalon business is, click the nifty ad below.

Hannah Lackoff

Hannah has been remarkably busy, as of late.

Two of her stories have recently been featured on the Manawaker Studio’s Flash Fiction Podcast.

The Path of Bones

The Path of Bones, featured on episode 144.

Download The Path of Bones here.

The Beer Connoisseur

“The Beer Connoisseur,” featured in episode 138.

Download The Beer Connisseur here.

“Six” appears, appropriately enough, in issue six of Shoreline of Infinity.

Following in “Six” footsteps, her story “Seven Ate Nine” appears in Flapperhouse #12.

“I Hope This Doesn’t Hurt My Chances,” a story Hannah describes as [FILL IN], appears in Dark Moon Digest issue #25. It’s also available on Amazon.

Lastly, Hannah’s story “Gamer” appears in Spirit’s Tincture Issue 2, available free online, and also in print.

Whew!

You can also pick up a preview of her collection, After the World Ended, right here. 

Pedro  Iniguez

Pedro’s first novel has recently released! Be sure to pick up a copy–Pedro is a very talented author, and this promises to be something special.

GREATER LOS ANGELES 2166 CE… WHEN A PROMINENT BUSINESSMAN is brutally murdered, Detective Audric Devereux is assigned the case. But nothing could have prepared him for a puppet master’s deadly game, a game that turns innocent women into mindless, cybernetic killing machines. Now, delving deep into the streets, Devereux must weave through the crazed, violent underbelly of the City of Angels, as death stalks the innocent and guilty alike.

Pedro’s story “Killadelphia” was just recently announced for Altered States II. Keep your eyes out for it.

Josh Reynolds

Speaking of remarkably busy authors…If anyone’s going to outpace Hannah, it’s Josh. In just the last few weeks, he’s released, announced, or otherwise had his fingers in the pies of the following:

Josh’s novel, Fabius Bile: Primogenitor, is available now from Black Library! (And on Amazon as well.) As he describes it, it’s “the perfect Christmas gift for Grandma!”

Josh was also recently interviewed at Black Library Live 2016.

His other new novel, Nagash: The Undying King, is available now~exclusively from Warhammer World.

The third of Josh’s four Advent 2016 stories released recently. Find it, his other advent stories, and an Advent subscription here.

Brian M. Sammons and Glynn Owen Barrass’ recent anthology, The Children of Gla’aki, was discussed at length on Microphones of Madness. You can listen to Part One here, and Part Two here. Josh’s story, a Royal Occultist tale, is discussed at length in Part Two.

John Linwood Grant

Occult Detective Quarterly #1 is currently at the printers!

A contents list has recently been revealed as well.

If Sam Gafford, Travis Neisler, Dave Brzeski and I don’t go insane first, ODQ1 will now have even more in it than expected, including EIGHT chunky stories, one of which is a novelette! Looks like 96 pages of goodness, including styles/eras such as Classic PI, Edwardian, Cosmic Horror, 1920s, Victorian hauntings and contemporary chills.

FICTION

“Got My Mojo Working” David T. Wilbanks & William Meikle
“When Soft Voices Die” Amanda DeWees
“Don’t Say I Didn’t Warn You” Adrian Cole
“Orbis Tertius” Josh Reynolds
“MonoChrome” T.E. Grau
“Baron of Bourbon Street” Aaron Vlek
Occult Legion Chapter One: “The Nest” William Meikle
“The Adventure of the Black Dog” Oscar Dowson

ARTICLES

The Occult Files of Doctor Spektor – Charles R Rutledge
The Man Behind Doctor Spektor: An Interview with Don F. Glut – Charles R Rutledge
“How to be a Fictional Victorian Ghost Hunter (In Five Easy Steps)” Tim Prasil

REVIEWS

Dave Brzeski and James Bojaciuk

Watch this space for more reveals on what Mr. Grant is doing with 18thWall Productions.

J Patrick Allen

His podcast, Rocket Punch Radio, can now be found on YouTube (in addtion to all the usual places).

Gregg Chamberlin

Gregg shares page-space with Hannah in Shoreline of Infinity #6, where you can find his story “A Visit at St. Nick’s.”

If Walls Could Talk: Pacing Your Pace

M.H. Norris

This column is called “If Walls Could Talk,” and for once the Wall talked. The Wall asked me to bring up something I said in last week’s post and to talk some more about it.

Last week I mentioned, and a couple of times before as well, that pacing is something I struggle with. Pacing is especially crucial at the end of the story, just where I tend to struggle with it most.

Pacing is one of those things you don’t notice unless it is being done wrong.

But done right, it’s a seamless part of a good story.

But when an episode of a TV show drags, or a movie doesn’t seem to be able to find it’s end, or there’s too much fluff in a book, we notice and it’s reflected in reviews and our opinion of it.

Pacing is something fun to talk about because, as I said earlier, you don’t always notice it when it’s done right. It is also something I struggle with.

Pacing Fails the Most in your Endings

They’re a balance where all the tension and anticipation you’ve spent however long building comes to a head and sometimes it feels like it’s hard to live up to the expectations you set for yourself, much less the ones set by readers.

One easy way to break tension is to have a character moment in the wrong place. That’s not to say you shouldn’t have them. No, they are necessary for the story.

Here’s an example:

In the fifth season of the show Psych, Shawn and Jules finally get together—but by the time the season finale rolls around they haven’t told her partner, Detective Carlton Lassiter (Lassie) yet. Lassie finds out when he catches them sneaking a kiss. But he doesn’t reveal that he knows until the next season premier.

From there, it becomes the premier’s B story as Lassiter reveals he is more hurt by her hiding it than them being together. They bicker a bit and it leaves you wondering if it’s going to affect the investigation they are involved in.

What it doesn’t do is stop the story so that they can have a moment to fight it out.

As much as I agree with Lassie, for a story-writing standpoint, the way the writers handled it is better. Instead of stopping the action in either episode, they wove the character moments into the story itself.

There have been times where I’ve tried to throw something character related in the wrong place. Usually that earns me a slap on the wrist, some red ink, and a “Try again, no.”

The beginning is another place I’ve seen some pacing problems

You can take too long to get to the heart of the story, or you can rush. Find the balance. Don’t let your readers get bored or don’t feel like they’re missing the first chapter or two.

Then we hit the dreaded middle where things tend to drag anyway. You’re too far to do beginning stuff and it’s a bit early for your climax so you’re stuck with this space where you don’t know what to do.

As a mystery writer, I’ll end up having to do the breakdown, oftenon paper. Yes, I am one of those nerds who hand writes notes. It helps me sort my thoughts out, and helps me know which pieces I’ve put into play and which pieces remain.

The middle is, to me, the second hardest place to maintain a good pace. There are writers who think it is the worst place, but I tend to stress a lot about my climaxes. No middle’s as bad to pace, for me, as a climax.

A story is the sum of all its parts

You’ve got the characters, the plot, the climax, the resolution, the location, and then you’ve got the pacing.

All of these have to work together for a story to fit.

Unfortunately, as I’ve said a couple times before, people might not notice if your story’s pacing is done right.

But then again, that’s a good thing.

If Walls Could Talk: ‘Tis the Season for Editing, Falalalala la la laaaaa

M.H. Norris

Working on edits is one of my least favorite things to do as a writer. Ask James, I’ve come a long, long, long way in that department (and for the record, it was me who added the extra long [and James who added the third]) but it is still something I dread.

One part of editing is cutting things. It can be hard. So often it’s easy to come up with justification. “But there’s a character moment there!” or “Don’t I need this to set this up?” or “This is important because…”

You get the idea.

How many of these have you used?

See, if I try to deny using any of these, James will add an editor’s note to this post and tell you some story that I’d prefer not get mentioned.

Writers get attached to their work; if you’re doing your job right then you have to. You’re writing thousands of words about one character (or a group of characters) and expect the reader to get invested enough to stay until the end.

And sometimes what we think is best for that investment and connection is not actually what’s best.

Which is why having a good editor is so, so important to a writer.

That person who tells you no. The person that takes the red pen (or has Microsoft Word frequently set to red text) to your work and leaves you wondering if there is at least one page in this entire story that doesn’t have red ink on it.

Let me tell you, those are the most satisfying pages.

Writers can’t be objective. Not about our own work that is. There are times we take great pleasure in ripping apart other writers and let the world know what we think they are doing wrong.

Yeah, I do it.

I’m not sure if this is a pep talk for you or I’m using this as an excuse to give myself a pep talk as I get ready to do edits on yet another story.

Either way, I’m a firm believe that behind every great writer is a great editor. (And writers, make sure you include them on your Christmas shopping list. Let’s be real, they put up with a lot from us all year round.)

I tease James all the time that I ignore his edits and don’t cut stuff but the truth is I think there’s only been twice where I’ve put something back he cut and that was after I justified it pretty extensively.

Why is stuff cut from a story?

Length

If you’re writing a short story for a collection, length is a factor. It’s less of one in a book but at the same time try to keep those between 50-85K words if at all possible.

Sometimes, your story is just a bit too long.

Or maybe it’s too short and by editing something out, you open up the door to add something else that is needed.

I’ve also had it where I didn’t explain something enough and entire scenes have been born to make sure the story flows better.

Which leads me to my next point…

Flow

Sometimes, stuff has to get cut or moved to another part of a story because it messes with the flow of the story. You’ve noticed it in a story before, or even an episode of TV, where something doesn’t quite work. It hurts how the rest of the episode flows together.

That’s when it’s important to let someone cut for you. You might not see that it’s going to hurt the overall story. But a good editor will point it out to you.

Pacing

This is something James has to get on me about. I think I did a post a couple of months ago about writing a climax and it is something I struggle with. The biggest struggle is pacing.

Your entire story builds up to it. It’s like TV. I can tell when a show has the right bad guy or not because of how far into the episode we are. Psych used to do it all the time. They always caught the bad guy about 36 minutes into the 42 minute episode.

Scenes sometimes disrupt pacing, especially when you get close to the end.

Once again, writers have trouble objectively seeing that problem.

Well, now that I’ve used writing this as an excuse to not work on edits long enough, I guess I should get back to it…

If you take nothing else away from what I say this week, take this. Find a good editor. It needs to be someone you can trust because I’ve done it both ways and the whole process goes smoother if you trust the person doing the edits.